Skip to content
Agriculture

What is agri-voltaic farming, and does it make sense for you?

Aerial view of solar arrays installed across agricultural land

Agri-voltaic farming — sometimes called agrivoltaics or agri-PV — is the practice of installing solar arrays above actively-farmed land, so the same hectare produces both electricity and crops. It's a promising approach in specific situations and a poor fit in others. Here's how to tell which applies to you.

The basic idea

Traditional ground-mount solar requires dedicated land, taking that land out of agricultural production. Agri-voltaic installations raise the panels higher (typically 3–5 metres) and space the rows wider, creating a partially-shaded growing environment underneath that still permits crops, grazing, or both.

The idea isn't new — research installations have been running for 15+ years — but it's only recently become economically viable at commercial scale as panel prices have dropped and specialised mounting structures have matured.

When agri-voltaic actually helps crops

Partial shading is beneficial for some crops and harmful for others. It's beneficial when:

  • Heat stress is a growing concern. Shade reduces evaporative water loss and protects plants from extreme temperatures.
  • The crop is shade-tolerant. Leafy greens (lettuce, spinach, kale), some herbs, some berries, and crops like coffee and cacao benefit.
  • Water is expensive or limited. Reduced evapotranspiration lowers irrigation needs, sometimes substantially.
  • Ground temperature matters. Cooler soil can extend growing seasons in hot climates.

For these crops, studies have sometimes shown yield improvements of 10–60% under partial shading compared to full sun, particularly during heatwaves.

When agri-voltaic hurts crops

Many staple crops need full sun:

  • Rice — needs full sun for grain filling; shading can reduce yield significantly.
  • Wheat, maize, soybeans — similar story; yields drop under meaningful shading.
  • Fruit trees (most) — especially those that require high light for fruit set.
  • Sugar cane, cotton — high sun-demand crops.

On land producing these crops, traditional ground-mount on marginal land often makes more sense than agri-voltaic that reduces food production.

Don't let the tech drive the crop decision

If someone pitches agri-voltaic as universally beneficial — be cautious. The economic case varies hugely by crop. For most staple agriculture, standard ground-mount on non-productive land is a better answer.

Livestock variations

Agri-voltaic also applies to grazing. Solar arrays with enough clearance for sheep, poultry, or small cattle can produce electricity while supporting livestock. Sheep grazing under solar is particularly well-studied and has proven economically viable in multiple regions — sheep keep vegetation low without damaging panels, and the shade benefits animal welfare during hot periods.

The economics look like this

Agri-voltaic installations typically cost 15–40% more per kWp than standard ground-mount, because of:

  • Taller, more complex mounting structures.
  • Wider row spacing (lower kWp per hectare).
  • Sometimes specialised tracking or vertical panel designs.
  • More complex electrical design.

This premium pays off when:

  • Land is constrained and dual-use generates meaningfully more total revenue than either use alone.
  • The specific crop benefits from partial shade (increasing crop revenue).
  • Local policy or incentives favour dual-land-use.
  • The farm's electricity demand absorbs much of the solar production on-site.

Design complications worth knowing

  • Mechanisation. Row spacing must accommodate tractor and harvester access. Retrofitting mechanised access to a finished installation is hard.
  • Shading patterns. Crops underneath see moving shade strips through the day. Some respond well; some don't.
  • Irrigation. Drip irrigation usually works well; overhead irrigation conflicts with the structure.
  • Maintenance access. Panel cleaning, inverter access, and crop-tending need to coexist.

How to know if it's right for your farm

The practical test is:

  1. List the crops you grow or want to grow. Which are shade-tolerant?
  2. Assess the current economic performance per hectare for those crops.
  3. Compare: (land value as crop-only) vs (land value as dual-use agri-voltaic) vs (partial land as crop + partial land as solar).
  4. Factor in how your farm uses electricity — on-site consumption makes agri-voltaic especially attractive.

Sometimes the answer is agri-voltaic. Sometimes it's traditional solar on a corner of the property. Sometimes it's no solar at all until something changes. Good advisory means saying which of the three applies.

Have a specific question about your site?

Book a 45-minute consultation. We will review your bill, the site, and tell you — honestly — whether now is the right time.

Book consultation